Core integrity dashboard
- Full Summary Dashboard
- ACII Score
- Missing References / Missing Citations
- Uncited References
CiteIntegrity helps researchers detect missing references, verify sources online, recover possible source links, review claim support and generate a professional citation integrity report with the ACII score.
Your work remains yours. CiteIntegrity analyses your document privately and does not use uploaded documents for AI training, plagiarism databases, public indexing, or permanent storage. Your document is processed securely and used only for citation integrity analysis.
Watch the workflow from manuscript upload to citation integrity results, including verification, ACII scoring, recovery guidance and report-ready outputs.
This video shows how users can upload a manuscript, run analysis, review citation-reference issues and interpret the results dashboard.
This presentation version shows the full review toolkit for checking, verifying, recovering, explaining and exporting citation integrity evidence, without displaying payment or pricing details.
Start from the analysis page, choose a citation style, then upload a DOCX manuscript or text-based PDF.
CiteIntegrity extracts in-text citations, references, authors, years and matches them across the manuscript.
References are verified online, unresolved items are flagged, and missing sources receive recovery guidance.
Review the ACII score, claim support, suggestions and downloadable reports for submission readiness.
Click Start checking to move directly into the analysis workflow.
The analysis page supports a straightforward intake flow. Users upload a DOCX manuscript or a text-based PDF, then select the matching citation style for the document.
After submission, CiteIntegrity processes the manuscript, matches citations to references, and begins online reference verification where enabled.
Once verification finishes, users can immediately see the ACII score, summary counts, match rate, and component-level interpretation of citation integrity performance.
The dashboard breaks the manuscript into actionable review sections so users can identify exactly what is missing, what is uncited, and how each citation maps to the reference list.
The verification section classifies sources as verified, likely, needs review or not found. This gives the reviewer a structured evidence trail for source credibility.
Recovery does more than flag errors. It explains what to do next, such as adding a missing reference, checking spelling and years, or confirming claim-to-source fit before a source is inserted.
Finally, users can inspect claim-to-source support, review non-invasive suggestions, and prepare the outputs needed for supervisor review, editorial screening or internal quality assurance.
Move from the demonstration directly into the live analysis page and run a full citation integrity review, including ACII scoring, verification, recovery and exportable outputs.
Fake citations, missing references, weak source support and inconsistent reference lists reduce credibility. CiteIntegrity turns those risks into visible checks and corrective actions.
Start checkingCheck citation problems before supervisor review, viva submission or journal manuscript preparation.
Use a clear report to identify missing citations, unverifiable references and weak claim support.
Add citation integrity checks to thesis submission, graduate school screening and quality assurance workflows.
Screen manuscripts for reference credibility before peer review and reduce preventable editorial delays.
CiteIntegrity found references that looked real but could not be verified. The report helped me separate genuine sources from citations that needed manual checking before I submitted my article.
Fake citation detectionMy dissertation had many chapters and a long reference list. CiteIntegrity quickly showed citations missing from the reference list and references that were never cited in the body.
Missing and uncited itemsAs a supervisor, I need to know whether the citations and references keep their story straight. The dashboard gives me a fast way to see what the student must correct.
Supervisor reviewThe claim support review was very useful. It showed areas where the cited source did not clearly support the statement, so I knew where stronger evidence was needed.
Claim supportThe recovery suggestions saved time. Instead of searching blindly, I received possible source links for problem citations and could decide which ones were correct.
Source recoveryThe ACII score and exportable report made the review easy to explain. I could correct the document, run it again and keep evidence of improvement for my records.
ACII and reportsNo. CiteIntegrity focuses on citation integrity. It checks whether in-text citations match references, whether references can be verified, whether possible sources can be recovered, and whether cited sources appear to support the surrounding claim.
No. Uploading your document to CiteIntegrity does not make it AI-generated. CiteIntegrity analyses the document you already wrote. It does not change your writing style, rewrite your work, or convert your thesis, dissertation, or manuscript into AI-generated content.
No. CiteIntegrity does not automatically rewrite your thesis, dissertation, manuscript, or research paper. It checks citation and reference issues such as missing citations, uncited references, citation-reference mismatches, author and year inconsistencies, online reference verification, claim-to-source support, and citation integrity using the ACII score.
No. Uploaded documents are not used to train AI models. Your document remains your intellectual property. CiteIntegrity does not use uploaded theses, dissertations, manuscripts, or research reports to train, fine-tune, or improve AI models.
No. CiteIntegrity does not submit uploaded documents to Turnitin, iThenticate, plagiarism databases, institutional repositories, public indexes, or search engines. Your document is processed privately for citation and reference analysis only.
No. CiteIntegrity does not publish, index, share, or deposit your document in any plagiarism repository. Because your document is not submitted to plagiarism databases, institutional repositories, search engines, or public indexes, uploading it to CiteIntegrity should not cause your own work to appear as plagiarised later.
No. Uploaded documents are not indexed by Google, Bing, institutional repositories, search engines, or public databases. Your document is analysed privately and is not made publicly searchable.
No. CiteIntegrity is designed for temporary document processing. The original uploaded document and extracted text are used only to generate the citation integrity analysis and report. Results summaries and report metadata may be kept temporarily by job ID within the active session or retention period.
CiteIntegrity may temporarily keep limited processing information such as the job ID, citation counts, reference verification status, ACII score, report metadata, and export status. CiteIntegrity avoids storing full thesis text, full chapters, unpublished findings, student names, supervisor comments, or institution-sensitive content unless such storage is clearly required and authorised.
No. CiteIntegrity should not send your full thesis or manuscript to external services. Where online reference verification is required, only limited citation metadata may be used, such as title, author, year, DOI, journal name, or publisher information. The full document remains private.
No. AI detectors assess the language, style, and statistical features of the writing itself. Simply uploading a document to CiteIntegrity does not make the document AI-generated. Since CiteIntegrity does not rewrite your work, it does not alter your authorship style.
Yes. CiteIntegrity is designed for unpublished academic work, including theses, dissertations, journal manuscripts, proposals, project reports, and research papers. CiteIntegrity does not publish, index, sell, share, or reuse uploaded documents.
No. CiteIntegrity is a support tool. It helps you identify citation and reference issues before submission, but final academic judgement remains with you, your supervisor, examiner, editor, or institution.
Yes, where sufficient context exists. CiteIntegrity can suggest possible sources for missing citations or weak support cases, but the user must confirm that the source is correct before citing it.
Yes. The platform is suitable for pre-submission screening, supervisor review, graduate school quality checks, and journal editorial workflows.
The landing page presents the product and sends users to the dedicated analysis page. Supported document types and styles should be shown inside the analysis workflow where document analysis actually happens.
You may say: I used CiteIntegrity only to check citation integrity, reference matching, source verification, and claim-support readiness. CiteIntegrity does not rewrite the thesis, does not submit it to plagiarism databases, does not index it online, and does not use uploaded documents for AI training.
For maximum privacy and responsible use, upload only the document you want analysed and ensure you have the right to submit it for citation integrity checking. After analysis, download your report and keep it for your own academic records.
Start with a manuscript check, review the ACII score and download a professional report for correction, supervision or editorial screening.